Logo

Arabic journal

Logo
العودة إلى المقالات

Enhancing Contrast Safety Knowledge in Radiology Residents Via A National Virtual Workshop

نوع الإرسال:

1 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

2 Radiology Department, Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

3 Department of Statistics, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

4 Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

5 Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

6 Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

7 Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

8 Department of Nephrology, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

9 College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

10 Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

11 Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

12 Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

المستخلص

Background: Training in contrast-related issues and managing contrast reactions are essential skills for radiology residents from their early training years. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a national virtual contrast workshop for first-year radiology residents across the Kingdom. Methods: All first-year radiology residents from across the Kingdom attended a one-day contrast workshop as part of the new "Core Radiology Skills" rotation. The workshop was delivered via a virtual platform and included didactic lectures and simulated case scenarios. Residents were asked to complete optional pre- and post-tests (20 multiple-choice questions) and a feedback form. The learning outcomes, lectures, simulated case scenarios, and tests were based on the content of the 2021 American College of Radiology (ACR) Manual on Contrast Media. Results: A total of 139 of 177 first- and second-year radiology residents completed the workshop and answered the pre-and post-tests. Most participants were from Riyadh province (41.8%) and Makkah province (31.6%). The mean overall pre-test score was 88.13 out of 200 (SD: 29.58), which significantly increased to 148.56 out of 200 (SD: 38.38) in the post-test, with a P-value of <.001 and a 57.2% overall percent change in scores. Participants' feedback indicated a positive reception of the course. Conclusion: The national virtual contrast media workshop effectively improved participants' knowledge. Favorable feedback reflects the workshop's success in addressing essential topics and delivering clear learning points. To enhance the educational experience, virtual breakout rooms should be considered. A six-month follow-up refresher course is recommended for long-term knowledge retention.

المواضيع الرئيسية

Special Education & Home Economy

الكلمات المفتاحية

Contrast
Workshop
Safety
Radiology
Residency

رخصة

Journal License

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب رخصة Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Volume 4, Proceeding of the 16th Annual Meeting of Radiology Society of Saudi Arabia (RSSA)

منشور

صفحات 109 - 135

الملفات

PDF

رؤى المقالة

عدد مرات مشاهدة المقال

5

تحميلات PDF

0

المراجع

  1. 1.
    American College of Radiology. ACR manual on contrast media. American College of Radiology; 2015.
  2. 2.
    Nandwana SB, Walls DG, Torres WE. Radiology department preparedness for the management of severe acute iodinated contrast reactions: do we need to change our approach?. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015 Jul;205(1):90-
  3. 3.
    Echenique AM, Joseph R, Casillas VJ. Recognition and treatment of reactions to contrast media: a model for resident and faculty education employing lectures and case scenario workshops. Academic radiology. 1997 Mar 1;4(3):230-
  4. 4.
    Ali S, Alexander A, Lambrix M, Ramakrishna R, Yang CW. High-fidelity simulation training for the diagnosis and management of adverse contrast media reactions. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2019 Jan;212(1):2-8.
  5. 5.
    Pfeifer K, Staib L, Arango J, Kirsch J, Arici M, Kappus L, et al. High-Fidelity Contrast Reaction Simulation Training: Performance Comparison of Faculty, Fellows, and Residents. Journal of the American College of Radiology [Internet]. 2016;13(1):81–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.08.016
  6. 6.
    Wang CL, Chinnugounder S, Hippe DS, Zaidi S, O'Malley RB, Bhargava P, Bush WH. Comparative effectiveness of hands-on versus computer simulation–based training for contrast media reactions and teamwork skills. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2017 Jan 1;14(1):103-10.
  7. 7.
    Wang CL, Schopp JG, Petscavage JM, Paladin AM, Richardson ML, Bush WH. Prospective randomized comparison of standard didactic lecture versus high-fidelity simulation for radiology resident contrast reaction management training. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011 Jun;196(6):1288-95.
  8. 8.
    Wang CL, Schopp JG, Kani K, Petscavage-Thomas JM, Zaidi S, Hippe DS, Paladin AM, Bush WH. Prospective randomized study of contrast reaction management curricula: computer-based interactive simulation versus high-fidelity hands-on simulation. European journal of radiology. 2013 Dec 1;82(12):2247-52.
  9. 9.
    LeBedis CA, Rosenkrantz AB, Otero HJ, Decker SJ, Ward RJ. Contrast reaction training in US radiology residencies: a COARDRI study. Clinical Imaging. 2017 May 1;43:140-3.
  10. 10.
    Petscavage JM, Paladin AM, Wang CL, Schopp JG, Richardson ML, Bush Jr WH. Current status of residency training of allergic-like adverse events to contrast media. Academic radiology. 2012 Feb 1;19(2):252-5.
  11. 11.
    Saudi Diagnostic Radiology Board Curriculum, updated version 2022
  12. 12.
    Petscavage JM, Wang CL, Schopp JG, Paladin AM, Richardson ML, Bush Jr WH. Cost analysis and feasibility of high-fidelity simulation based radiology contrast reaction curriculum. Academic radiology. 2011 Jan 1;18(1):107-12.
  13. 13.
    Gaca AM, Lerner CB, Frush DP. The radiology perspective: needs and tools for management of life-threatening events. Pediatric radiology. 2008 Nov;38(Suppl 4):714-9.
  14. 14.
    [Sabir SH, Aran S, Abujudeh H. Simulation-based training in radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014 May 1;11(5):512-7.
  15. 15.
    Sarwani N, Tappouni R, Flemming D. Use of a simulation laboratory to train radiology residents in the management of acute radiologic emergencies. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012 Aug;199(2):244-51.
  16. 16.
    Levett-Jones T, Lapkin S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurse education today. 2014 Jun 1;34(6):e58-63.
  17. 17.
    Trout AT, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Khalatbari S. Teaching management of contrast reactions: does it work and how often do we need to refresh?. Academic radiology. 2012 Apr 1;19(4):498-504.
  18. 18.
    Picard M, Curry N, Collins H, Soma L, Hill J. Comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus didactic instruction as a reinforcement intervention in a comprehensive curriculum for radiology trainees in learning contrast reaction management: does it matter how we refresh?. Academic Radiology. 2015 Oct 1;22(10):1268-76.
  19. 19.
    Chinnugounder S, Hippe DS, Maximin S, O’Malley RB, Wang CL. Perceived barriers to the use of high-fidelity hands-on simulation training for contrast reaction management: why programs are not using it. Current problems in diagnostic radiology. 2015 Nov 1;44(6):474-8.